Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avenue 52


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 11:55, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Avenue 52

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I love this band, I really do. The problem is, I'm pretty sure they're not notable enough for Wikipedia. They're unsigned, I don't think they've ever charted, they haven't actually won any awards, and the only significant coverage I could find was, which is already in the article. Luke no 94 (tell Luke off here) 11:22, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:29, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:29, 17 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. The band doesn't appear to have yet reached a level where an encyclopedia article is justified. --Michig (talk) 20:23, 17 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON, simply not enough just yet. J04n(talk page) 11:25, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.