Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aveox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete unsourced, very probable COI, Gnangarra 13:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Aveox

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable corporation. DodgerOfZion (talk) 02:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. unsourced and notability per WP:CORP unestablished. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 05:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. I have heard of their brushless motors for R/C models, they are popular and well known. Could be a WP:COI problem with the user name though, remarkably similar to the company in question. Nimbus227 (talk) 00:40, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've been using Aveox motors for ages and as Nibus227 mentioned they are a well known and respected brand. I can also say that as of late they seem to be moving into higher markets. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rcftw (talk • contribs) 16:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable subject. Article does not even assert notability. Dgf32 (talk) 23:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep They are obviously a reputable and notable company, selling products worldwide (Aveox motors are available in the UK), there are also hints of high profile aerospace component use. The article however needs expanding with research, independent references and an independent editor without turning it into an advert. It is purely a matter of proving notability. If that does not happen within a certain time frame then delete, there must be a process for this? Nimbus227 (talk) 00:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.