Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Average usage billing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:49, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Average usage billing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Pinging those who have looked at its notability before:,. Boleyn (talk) 13:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 13:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I worked on this article, like, so long ago... it is far from my areas of interest, but, well, it lacks sources and has never grown beyond a stub, an nobody ever worked on its issues, so I guess it hasn't got much future. Victão Lopes  Fala! 15:39, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete-Per nom. Wgolf (talk) 23:51, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 14 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge a sentence or two into Burstable billing and redirect there. You can source to, and the target article already mentions the concept.  --j⚛e deckertalk 03:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, lacks reliable sources, issue of WP:V. - Mailer Diablo 17:10, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.