Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avery Stafford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nomination withdrawn upon significant improvements by. (non-admin closure)  Goodvac   ( talk ) 01:26, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Avery Stafford

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

This BLP is completely unsourced and has been since its creation in December 2008, and I am unable to find even one mention in a google news source. I see a few mentions/short pieces on websites but nothing I could claim to be a reliable source, so subject fails WP:GNG unless sources can be found. This is nominated as part of the Unreferenced BLP Project's current drive to source all BLPs tagged as unsourced in December 2008. Please help us! Milowent • talkblp-r 16:59, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Unsourced, did not establish notability. Creator is an SPA:, and wrote most of the page. (diff of first edit to now.) OSbornarfcontributionatoration 17:06, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Withdraw delete vote, Jclemens has drastically improved the article. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 03:34, 11 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:34, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:35, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I've removed or toned down the colloquial/puff parts of this, added a ton of citations. He still doesn't appear to have charted, but he appears to have met WP:BAND numbers 1 and 7, based on my research. Jclemens (talk) 20:54, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Jclemens has done good work trying to bring this up to snuff. I would be perfectly fine withdrawing the nom, though we've already drawn a delete vote.--Milowent • talkblp-r  02:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Sole delete vote is withdrawn, I withdraw nom.--Milowent • talkblp-r 04:26, 11 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep: per JC - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:18, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.