Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avian phenomena and incidents


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:05, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Avian phenomena and incidents

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to meet Standalone lists ~ Lists that are too general or too broad in scope have little value ~ in that it is enormously broad, not specific enough, and fairly incapable of completeness. A realistic argument could be made for including both wings and foreign object damage, which don't really have enough of a link; happy days, LindsayHello 16:38, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. happy days, LindsayHello 16:38, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. happy days, LindsayHello 16:38, 11 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Per nom. Was expecting a little more than this junk when I clicked on it... Reywas92Talk 17:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete definitely per nom. Talk about overly broad and vague (plus a search term no one in their right mind would ever use). -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Way to broad of a list to the point of being meaningless. I also agree it's a wack search term that no one is going to use. Maybe if it was based on some academic thing or something, but it isn't. I totally thought it would be though. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete this seems unessescary. --TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 22:50, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, the current collection is wacky and implausible. A full list of avian related phenomena and incidents would be overly broad.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 13:29, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Perhaps there is special providence in the fall of a sparrow, but this list just can't take flight. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 06:07, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete For now. If there is any potential to create this in future then it can go through draft. Orientls (talk) 18:07, 18 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.