Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aviation Mall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep consensus is that it is notable enough with sources added being judged to be sufficient. Davewild (talk) 18:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Aviation Mall

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Tagged for notability since September with no improvements. Overwhelming majority of GHits are an infinite number of cookie-cutter websites with showtimes for the mall's theater; no reliable sources found. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletions.    Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems to be an orphaned article; half of it is pretty much just listing the shops. Also, I really see a lack of notability.  jj137  ♠  Talk 23:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as the only big mall in Glens Falls, or Warren County, New York, for that matter. This is the maul that destroyed the real location of Bedford Falls of It's a Wonderful Life fame. Bearian (talk) 01:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Biggest in the city isn't enough; most malls are the biggest in their city since a lot of smaller towns and regions only have one mall. Besides the fact that this mall has a ton of big box anchors (which seems to be a pattern for Pyramid owned malls), there's nothing that makes this one more than marginally notable outside its community. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * As has been discussed in other AfD's, there is no 'locality' clause in WP:N. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  04:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Keep Size and scope, accompanied by the sources provided, support a claim of notability. Alansohn (talk) 06:27, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems notable enough, also has reliable sources. STORMTRACKER   94  13:12, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.