Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aviator Airlines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 08:40, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Aviator Airlines

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article on an air charter company that once operated one (1) leased airplane and went bankrupt after 18 months. Article is sourced to a couple WP:ROUTINE and incidental mentions on marginally RS sites. A BEFORE finds nothing else. Chetsford (talk) 15:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:54, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:54, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:54, 24 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep having operated a commercial flight it is of note, the fact the referencing could be better is not a reason for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 16:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * "having operated a commercial flight it is of note" While this may or may not be true, we have unambiguous standards for what constitutes WP:N for purposes of article retention on WP and selling tickets on an airplane is not one of them. Chetsford (talk) 17:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Airlines play a significant part in the transportation industry. It's charter still appears to be active. JAH2k (talk) 16:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * "It's charter still appears to be active." While this may or may not be true, we have unambiguous standards for what constitutes WP:N for purposes of article retention on WP and holding a flight charter from a civil aviation authority is not one of them. Chetsford (talk) 17:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete, airlines are not inherently notable and this one shows no indication of passing WP:NORG. Renata (talk) 13:55, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The airline clearly isn't notable by the WP:NORG standards and things don't get articles simply because they existed, despite what some users might think. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:27, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Gnews yields 1 hit, a press release. LibStar (talk) 04:05, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per Renata and others. Smallbones( smalltalk ) 17:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.