Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avidian (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Avidian (2nd nomination)

 * — (View AfD)

non-notable company. Prior nomination was no consensus. Two votes in favour of keeping were the creator, who claimed he would expand it, and someone who gave its notability as "growing exponentially" without evidence. However the article remains little more than an advertising stub with no assertion of notability. Akihabara 08:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Edison 22:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as a non-notabale company. Big  top  23:40, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This can always be recreated at such time as interested parties can give it time and attention. skrshawk  (  Talk  |  Contribs  ) 03:26, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * delete, it clearly is not notable at this time, as it doesn't seem notable enough to attract attention from those who know something about it.DGG 02:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. Pete.Hurd 03:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.