Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aviel Gabai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:09, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Aviel Gabai

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:41, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following article for the same reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:37, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:42, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete both - fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:52, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:55, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:55, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:55, 23 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 10:05, 30 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Aviel Gabai - meets WP:GNG with media coverage  Nfitz (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete both - players who have not played in a fully professional league nor senior international football so fail WP:NFOOTY. No indication of any other achievements partnering significant reliable coverage to pass WP:GNG either. Links to coverage above are to articles of minimal length. No indication of significant coverage of either player. Fenix down (talk) 06:38, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete both per Fenix down. Meeting GNG is not established in either case. C679 09:33, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.