Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avishek Majumder (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per WP:G4 -- an exact recreation of previously version deleted per AFD — Cactus Writer (talk) 15:27, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Avishek Majumder
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article appears to fail WP:ANYBIO, WP:MUSICBIO, WP:GNG and probably more policies and guidelines.

I have carefully searched for reliable sources about this musician, but have found none. Given the extensive coverage of the Indian film industry in English language media, this appears to me to suggest that this musician fails the tests for inclusion in Wikipedia. Shirt58 (talk) 08:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    10:23, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    10:23, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    10:23, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * how about WP:G4? Its not been even a month since last AfD Articles for deletion/Avishek Majumder. Did you miss it or overrule it for some purpose? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:44, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Did you miss it or overrule it for some purpose?
 * You are right. I am wrong. I missed the first AfD. I should have known better. See WP:ADMINCOND\WP:ADMINACCT
 * That said, I do not think I have misused my WP:ADMIN privileges here.
 * What you think? Pete AU aka Shirt58
 * I am not understanding what you took from my post. I was just implying that if you have missed it; whuch is very likely being a human, it can still be tagged for CSD by you or me or anyone; unless you have overruled that option for some unstated reasons. I was no where calling your actions some kind of misuse of your tools. CSD tagging it simply saves some community time. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:53, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Just FYI: This recreation has not been improved after the previous AFD which resulted delete. I've tagged it with G4 accordingly. Best,  Jim Car ter  13:23, 15 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.