Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avotone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's vandalproof page &#x260E;  ) 20:33, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Avotone
Advertising. -- howcheng  [ talk &#149; contribs &#149; web ] 22:40, 24 October 2005 (UTC) Good information about a new product line. If huge brands like Loreal get a page, so should smaller companies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timmyg (talk • contribs) 22:09, 25 October 2005, who blanked out above lines
 * Delete &mdash; WP:NOT advertising. &mdash; RJH 17:37, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: L'Oreal is a huge company that has a large share of the cosmetics market; thus they are notable. Avotone is not, unless you have some verification to back your claims? -- howcheng  [ talk &#149; contribs &#149; web ] 23:40, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

But it is noticable for the people that buy Avotone Products. Although it is not as large as the other main brands, it still has a loyal base of customers.
 * Comment: WP:CORP has the guidelines for inclusion of articles on companies. Please enlighten us if Avotone meets those guidelines. -- howcheng  [ talk &#149; contribs &#149; web ] 16:40, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Thank you for pointing me in the right direction. I will do my best to meet the standards listed.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.