Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avraham Gileadi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to September Six. Stifle (talk) 08:52, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Avraham Gileadi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable academic, fails WP:PROF, no significant coverage in non-scholarly sources, etc. PROD removed by IP editor. There are some additional sources that could be added here -- but nothing sufficient to establish notability (one set describes his excommunication). Nomoskedasticity (talk) 11:17, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —Nomoskedasticity (talk) 11:18, 5 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Does not meet notability standards --יום יפה (talk) 11:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Negligible cites of his books on GS. Has been excommunicated from and received back into the Mormon Church, but few details are available. This would be a WP:BLP1E. Xxanthippe (talk) 11:53, 5 April 2011 (UTC).
 * Delete and merge content to September Six - The notability here revolves around the September Six incident. We should take the few relevant bits of info and merge to that article as appropriate.--Descartes1979 (talk) 15:43, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. He continues to pop up in stories and books about LDS understandings of Jewish/Hebrew influence in Mormonism. Not a lot, but enough to get past the 1E threshhold.  Merger to September Six could be discussed, but I think that would need to be a keep result here, to preserve the editing history.--Arxiloxos (talk) 16:08, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  —Arxiloxos (talk) 16:17, 5 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge to September Six. 1E doesn't demand deletion; merger to the event is more appropriate in this case. Jclemens (talk) 17:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - His story is in the other article. No need to merge, he is already mentioned there.--Effingcrazy (talk) 17:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.