Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avsharyan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Keeper |  76  02:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Avsharyan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-WP:notable surname. PROD removed by author. Although there may be any number of people in the world named Avsharyan (or its variant Avsharian), none of them appear to have articles in the English Wikipedia. The present article lists redlinks to two people that the author felt worthy to include, but there is no indication that either of them would actually meet the criteria for inclusion. When (if) such article exist, there might be a need for an Avsharyan (surname) article, but not before then. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:37, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 18 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I think that you can write an article about Avsharyan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seim Dak (talk • contribs) 06:09, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Avsharyan, Amazon


 * Avsharyan, publishing house


 * Avsharyan, cyclopedia


 * I found something else: Avsharyans books: Books — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seim Dak (talk • contribs) 05:48, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment As stated in the original nomination, there is no dispute that there are people named Avsharian in the world (which is about all Seim Dak's links prove). But the fact that none of these people yet have Wikipedia articles makes it unnecessary to have an article about the name, if it doesn't apply to any articles in the project.  (See WP:LISTPEOPLE.)  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:05, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete there is simply no policy based rationale for keeping this. J04n(talk page) 00:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.