Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awaken (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   move to incubator, with the standard reminder that it can't just sit there if better sourcing doesn't materialize. Seraphimblade Talk to me 10:13, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Awaken (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Movie clearly lacks notability. JoelWhy (talk) 13:55, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 23 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: I found no coverage. SL93 (talk) 22:21, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Incubate for a short while per WP:TOOSOON and WP:NFF. This film will be debuting on April 30... in just 7 days... at the Newport Beach Film Festival, followed by other festivals, and has the particpation of notables Corey Sevier, Jordan Ladd, and Kim Poirier. While its lacking release fails WP:NFF, and lack of coverage fails WP:GNG and WP:NF, THAT is a situation that should be rectified in a very short time.  Rather than offer 2-1/2 hours after it was created to delete a new article on a soon-to-premiere film, we can, per instructions at WP:Deletion policy, place it out of mainspace and in a location where it will benefit from collaborative editing as its quite imminent release draws nigh.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:41, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:TOOSOON and suggest the creator get a WP:REFUND for WP:AfC at a later date. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:14, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: It's premiering tonight, April 30 . The incubator was set up specifically for cases such as this, where there is "an intention that the article can and will be improved".  Sadly, outright deletion, however temporary, takes the topic out of these pages and eliminates any opportunity for collaborative editing to address issues.  If it is not sent to the incubator as deletion policy encourages, I request a relist so we might A) await expected coverage of the film, and B) not have to go through possible WP:REFUND in a few days. .  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:12, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 20:45, 1 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment ~ Looks like a run-of-the-mill/generic made for TV movie with nothing particualrly notable about it. Though I do appreciate Schmidt's comments on incubation, since it aired so recently. As it is, there is only one source in the article, which is Facebook, so at the very least, a higher-quality WP:RS needs to be found if it is to remain long-term. — GabeMc (talk) 00:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * incubate as above. Chnage !vote. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:35, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.