Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awesome Tapes From Africa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn and no recommendation for deletion (Speedy Keep Criteria No. 1). (Non-admin closure)  Rebb  ing   07:19, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Awesome Tapes From Africa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and WP:WEB. I can't find any evidence of notability. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 15:47, 12 March 2016 (UTC) Keep. Nomination withdrawn. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 06:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  16:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  16:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  16:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  16:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I created the article stub. I am not affiliated with the subject. The organization/record label written about has many articles about it, including citations in the entry from The Wire, a famous and influential British music magazine distributed from England, and The Guardian, a major international Newspaper. Yellow Swans (talk) 17:32, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Revisited: I've added releases, list of artists on the label, links to those artists' Wikipedia pages, and made clear reference sources to articles and interviews with The Guardian, The Village Voice, KCET, KPCC, Resident Advisor, and more. All of this should help with notability. Yellow Swans (talk) 01:56, 13 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 18:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Enough good coverage to demonstrate notability. --Michig (talk) 07:17, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep perhaps as this may be enough to keep for now. SwisterTwister   talk  22:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep – The subject meets WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include, but are not limited to:, , , , , . North America1000 12:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep as reliable sources coverage has been presented as detailed above, so that WP:GNG is passed. Atlantic306 (talk) 00:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.