Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awesome sauce (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete per WP:SNOW. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:36, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Awesome sauce
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails Wp:NEO. Was PRODed, template removed. One of those awkward pages that doesn't easily fit into any CSD class.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NFT Studerby (talk) 00:10, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NEO appears to have been written with this kind of thing in mind. I'll point out that the result of the last afd involved wp:snow... ErikHaugen (talk) 01:17, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOTDIC, WP:NEO, WP:NFT, WP:G3? Take your pick. — Rankiri (talk) 01:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Dissolve with a mixture of HP Sauce, Worcestor Sauce, Ketchup, Tabasco and Gentlemen's Relish, then it can be poured into urban dictionary where it belongs.Amentet (talk) 03:18, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Total fail on where the term came from; I heard it as early as 2007! Per all of Rankiri's reasonings, and maybe we can pour this sauce onto a WP:TROUT for the creator.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:14, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete this definition is totally wrong, and not the common defintion of the internet meme. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 06:51, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. In fairness to the article creator, though, this article does not contain nonsensical claims about the origin of the term, as the article deleted in 2006 did. Rather, this version limits itself to exaggerated claims about how popular the term is. I guess that's an improvement ... but not enough to overcome WP:NEO. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 08:13, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons that I gave when I prodded it. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) &#124; (talk to me) &#124; (What I've done)  12:30, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Awesome article, to be sure, but it looks like someone in Smith Falls is getting cabin fever. Mandsford (talk) 13:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - awesome joke, awesomely unencyclopedic.--Kudpung (talk) 19:45, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete - Per the above. Looks like its time to give this an early closure, per WP:SNOWBALL, Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  19:49, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, nonsense. –Grondemar 23:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete It's funny, but it's also unsourced inappropriate unencyclopedic pov nonsense. Vampyrecat (talk) 01:38, 18 February 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.