Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awesomely bad

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:32, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Awesomely bad
Neologism. &rarr;I&ntilde;g&#333;lemo&larr;  talk  04:44, 2005 May 20 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Agree. Longhair | Talk 06:48, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Should be awesomely deleted as neologism. -- Jonel 06:58, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. Megan1967 07:54, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, on a scale of one to awesome, this is zero.--the wub (talk) 08:15, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pointless. Jamyskis 09:51, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh gosh, this is frightfully interesting stuff, what? No, terribly interesting? Um, no it isn't. Don't transwiki to Wiktionary, just zap it. -- Hoary 00:40, 2005 May 21 (UTC)
 * Awesomely delete-worthy. Chris talk back 02:25, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge to VH1 and delete. &mdash; Phil Welch 20:56, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.