Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awksglokin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Aksi_great (talk) 20:26, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Awksglokin


Reads like original research. A single direct source given (Mental Floss) but I can't find any information at all on 'Dr. Boris Shleskin'. Zero ghits for 'Awksglokin'; no relevant ghits for 'The Ultimate Theory of Really Big Numbers'. The Hitchikers Guide connection is tenuous. Apologies in advance if this is notable and verifiable. Marasmusine 10:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 10:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as pretty obvious and massive hoax, but move content first to WP:BJAODN. "Mental Floss" has never had an issue 22; "awksglokin" is not used in any field; HHGTTG does not mention it. Wikipedia is not for things made up after reading Douglas Adams one day. For one thing, Douglas Adams would have been funnier. -- Charlene 10:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax and/or original research. Hello32020 12:41, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as blatant hoax. And the lord said: Let there be crap!!! MartinDK 13:32, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MartinDK, just remember to flush! Torinir ( Ding my phone  My support calls   E-Support Options  ) 20:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or Speedy delete: on the borderline between patent nonsense and complete bollocks. -- Ekjon Lok 04:56, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * There is a theory that Deleting it will cause it to be replaced by something only more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory that this has already happened. Mishatx 07:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, although according to something I read somewhere, it doesn't behave like other articles and would thus become a redirect to 1 (number). --WikiSlasher 09:13, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * And lets hope it doesn't implode or something and create a whole new wikiverse. Marasmusine 17:06, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * That would be somebody else's problem. -- Charlene 16:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.