Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awkward silence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:43, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Awkward silence
Somewhere between original research, dictdef, and a joke (the example cited sounds like an inside joke between the author and the other sole editor).  Oh no  itsJamie Talk 18:20, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. --DelftUser 18:27, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PJM 18:40, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can believe that there may be some psycholinguistic research on this topic.  But without any references, I have to believe that this article, as written, is a joke.  If the authors can provide a citation to a peer-reviewed study, I would change my view.  --Thunk 18:56, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and mark for cleanup. Could be good with some references and examples.  Powers 19:44, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as O.R. Ruby 19:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as OR/Unverifiable, unless some good citations to this actually being studies can be provided. Peyna 19:58, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Can anyone provide a citation to a research paper on this topic? If not, delete the article as a private joke in a public forum.  (aeropagitica)   21:33, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Latinus 23:49, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I can't imagine why this page would be deleted? Awkward silence is certainly a roundly acknowledged concept. Thesham69 02:53, 27 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.