Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aww Nigga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy delete. --MONGO 07:04, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Aww Nigga
A video clip featured on http://www.awwnigga.com/. I don't see any claims to notability, and the website itself has no Alexa rank. --Hetar 01:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC) Speedy Delete Per nom. Total garbage. Ckessler 06:32, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Likely just an advertisement-- Conrad Devonshire  Talk  01:08, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete adcruft. What it takes for people to get off these days... Aplomado  talk 01:12, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete frankly, this should be speedied for being pure nonsense. There is nothing encyclopedic about a homemade porn film. IrishGuy 01:17, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Dear Lord. - Richardcavell 01:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per IrishGuy M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 02:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete racist junk. Notability not established. CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 02:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Needs to go. Per Nom. Navou   talk  02:57, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - nn. --Hyperbole 02:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete for the love of all things good and true BigDT 05:40, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per the above. G  y  re  05:44, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into List of internet memes or whatever that article is. This is popular on teh intarwebs for some reason. --Rory096 05:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Where's an admin when you need one! ;)  If someone wants he or she should add this to the "internet memes" page listed above...  But it is not worthy of its own page.--Dakart 05:51, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I tagged it as db-nonsense, but another editor removed my tag. I maintain that this portion of the definion of patent nonsense fits: Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever.  Even if it doesn't, certainly this "Tone" fellow and his friends are non-notable.  So delete it as a vanity article.  This is most certainly an "addition, deletion, or change to content made in a deliberate attempt to reduce the quality of the encyclopedia."  So speedy it as vandalism.  This article gives us no context on which to base expansion.  That's another criterion for an article speedy.  So pick one - A1, A7, G1, G3 - just speedy it.  ;)  BigDT 06:24, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.