Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axcelis Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 03:19, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Axcelis Technologies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Speedy deletion declined because of "possible significance", though it is left unclear from the article what this significance is. Seems to be a part of Eaton Corporation that was "spun off" in 2000. Maybe Axcelis Technologies deserves a short paragraph there. Currently the article is cited only to a Google Finance table. I can't see anything of great consequence online in any general news sources to suggest the company is widely known. Fails WP:NCORP. Sionk (talk) 22:08, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Oppose per WP:GNG. From a quick Google search, the company has recently received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Sovereign  / Sentinel  11:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * For example? Sionk (talk) 21:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Apparently has a six percent market-share for something called ion implaters, the smallest of all the vendors listed in the EE Times article. $200 million in revenues would usually suggest some marginal notability, but I haven't found anything in-depth yet. EE Times does have a lot of blurbs about layoffs and pay cuts at the firm and other things Looks potentially borderline to me. I would lean towards delete, if only because nothing in the current article is actually sourced. CorporateM (Talk) 22:55, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  13:32, 30 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk   17:25, 7 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.