Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axel Boman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 15:39, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Axel Boman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 20:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Google News shows plenty of reliable sources with significant coverage, some English some not, but all can be considered for notability. --TTTommy111 (talk) 05:55, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I could find plenty of hits on Google news, but mainly from non-English sources I was unsure of, or small mentions in sources which seemed unreliable, e.g. blogs, adverts. Which sources did you think were reliable and significant, ? Thanks for your help, Boleyn (talk) 06:44, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Reply - @ - Sorry for the delay, I'm only around about twice a week. Taking into consideration English references alone, there are these -, , , and . One is an interview so it really doesn't count, but the intro of it supports information about him and is in a reliable source (which shows that he is large enough to be in these publications and not just some simple Wordpress blogs). I did not dig too much deeper as I did not think it necessary. I also did not go through any of the non-English sources. --TTTommy111 (talk) 19:45, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Uncertain for now as searches here and here found results and one of those same links here (nothing at thefreelibrary) so I'm not sure if this all adds to solid notability. SwisterTwister   talk  06:05, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - As above. J 1982 (talk) 17:04, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - the article is a poor stub.. but that is not a reason for deletion. AFD is not a clean-up service, subject passes WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:03, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. There has been plenty of independent coverage in reliable sources (eg: ) that show this guy meets the WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Thanks — sparklism hey! 12:54, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.