Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axiom-man (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Already deleted as G12 (unambiguous copyright infringement) by User:Ronhjones. Michig (talk) 08:56, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Axiom-man
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Completely unsourced article about a series of novels by a non-notable writer, written entirely as a plot-summary and offering no real-world context to get it over WP:NBOOK for anything. The article was previously kept in a deletion discussion in 2009 on the basis of purported reliable source coverage existing, but (a) I'm certainly not finding hide nor hair of any coverage outside of Blogspot blogs, and (b) the article has never seen any actual improvement since 2009. This has also been flagged copyvio, but I don't consider it speediable on that basis -- apart from one sentence that was obviously copy-pasted, the "vio" is otherwise entirely on three-word phrases like "mysterious black cloud" and "author A.P. Fuchs" that one could hardly patent as a unique turn of phrase. But even if not speediable, it is entirely deletable. Bearcat (talk) 03:41, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:39, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:39, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:39, 6 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete A very oddly-written plot summary of a non-noteable book. Comatmebro  User talk:Comatmebro 05:55, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NBOOK and WP:NOTE, possible csd material and per nom Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:48, 11 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.