Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axiomatic property theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete per WP:CSD. Wanting to have a discussion of the other non-merits of the article is not a sufficient reason to keep copyvio material around. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Axiomatic property theory

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I thought this was a maths topic but it has been classified as law. Essentially original research, user:Boyarkin seems to have copied their own web page. (But it would be dodging the issue to delete it as a copyvio.) &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 22:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * speedy delete I added a Speedy Deletion tag to the article for copyright infringement  C t j f 8 3 Talk 23:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * (Tagged as copyvio of property-theory-eng.narod.ru/ specifically.) — Athaenara  ✉  00:50, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

01:27, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment to ^^^: The nominator knows this is a copyvio, but still wants to discuss this article here so that we have a firmer rationale - original research - for deleting it. Thus I have declined the speedy delete request. And yeah, delete as OR. Pegasus &laquo;C&brvbar;T&raquo; 01:27, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Send to WP:CP. Stifle (talk) 13:58, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and send to WP:CP seems a good idea. This is not definitively OR (there are references) and if the nominator is not prepared to delete on sight then the author should be given the opportunity to get a ticket. TerriersFan (talk) 15:04, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.