Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axis Communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Axis Communications

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable org, reads like an advert, only primary sources  Chzz  ►  14:46, 25 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep: Someone had edited the article from it's proper state to the state that you nominated for deletion - if you had checked the history, you would have noticed this. I have reverted to the last good revision which was encyclopedic and certainly doesn't fall under the deletion critera, although kept the delete template so that others can see this is a mistake and comment accordingly. I suggest, if you want to nominate articles for deletion, you make sure that you aren't misguided. As for being a non-notable organisation, I believe they are the biggest manufacturer of IP CCTV cameras in the world, so please do your homework before making wild, inaccurate claims. Bungle (talk • contribs) 15:40, 25 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - no third-party sources? If they're that notable, lets have some reliable sources. Parrot of Doom (talk) 15:58, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Surely a google search is sufficient? I'm not associated with the company in any way, and I wont lose sleep if the article gets deleted, but I know that the company is notable for what they manufacturer. The original AfD was on the basis of the badly revised edition, which in some respects makes it void. Noone had nominated it before then.. Bungle (talk • contribs) 16:08, 25 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per Bungle. Business with annual revenue in the mid-nine figures (USD). Formal corporate reports like the one cited are generally acceptable sources for claims that aren't unduly self-serving, and annual revenue looks to be a reasonable claim. May need improvement, but that's not grounds for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:01, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Bungle. It's also a company that is traded on the OMX stock exchange, which reasonably should make it inherently notable. Tomas e (talk) 13:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Google News search shows some RS (Boston Globe for example). Admrboltz (talk) 13:17, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.