Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axis Mundi Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As the delete argument that the articles does not meet the notability guidelines due to a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources has not been refuted. Davewild (talk) 17:29, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Axis Mundi Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough coverage in reliable sources to verify or sustain an article. Fails general notability and WP:NCORP. The article makes no claim of notability and has no sources. All sources I can find on the web seem to be things like Facebook and Soundcloud. J bh Talk  20:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

There are numerous blogs/interviews that cover these artists. The page is in its early stages, but will be up and functioning very soon with many notable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jleiter10 (talk • contribs) 20:53, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Just added multiple references to sites such as Billboard and Spin.com that premiered album releases' for said artists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jleiter10 (talk • contribs) 21:09, 28 May 2015 (UTC) Comment People like myself who are fans of music like to find new music by searching for record labels. I am a fan of Crystal Fighters and was recently introduced to IS TROPICAL and saw they joined a new label. I began searching for other releases from the label and noticed there wasn't a Wikipedia page. If you look at a lot of independent record labels (Carpark Records, Gnar Tapes...) you will notice they pretty much only list the releases by the label That doesn't make those pages useless. I have discovered many great bands from both of the mentioned wiki pages so wanted to compile a page for this label to reciprocate for those who have put the time in to provide me with ways to find new music over the years. Jleiter10 (talk) 00:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment What the article needs to show notability are articles from independent, third party reliable sources which talk about the company not about the artists. Please see WP:NCORP, WP:ORGIND, WP:ORGDEPTH for some of the specific guidelines. PS. Please remember to sign your talk page comments with  . This will insert your user name and date automatically.  J bh  Talk  23:40, 28 May 2015 (UTC)


 * DeleteSome sources, but not of them show any WP:ORGDEPTH. As a result, fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 30 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now simply because there isn't significant and notable coverage and News for example gave me Brown Bird's song "Axis Mundi" with Highbeam and thefreelibrary. A recently started label with a few artists but no notability for now. SwisterTwister   talk  04:22, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Contest As I said before, there are a number of labels on Wikipedia, that do not have secondary sources mentioning them. I am simply a fan attempting to spread good music. Jleiter10 (talk) 14:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Then please nominate them for deletion as they are non-notable as well. J bh  Talk  14:27, 1 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.