Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axonie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 04:20, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Axonie

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't find a single RS source Greek Legend (talk) 01:15, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:27, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:27, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. The title is misspelled, that's why the nominator was not able to find any sources. The common name is Akhuni or Axone (see ). utcursch &#124; talk 04:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  05:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The sources given by utcursch are enough to establish notability, so keep and move to Akhuni. Uanfala (talk) 22:05, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: there's an older AfD discussion: Articles for deletion/Axone (curry) about an old and badly written version of this article. Uanfala (talk) 22:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:49, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. This just shows why some articles need multiple spellings. I never use the search function inside Wiki anymore.VanEman (talk) 17:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as I meant to comment sooner, this is convincing enough to keep. SwisterTwister   talk  05:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, per utcursch's comment. --Erick Shepherd (talk) 20:59, 7 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.