Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axosoft


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to OnTime. There is consensus that the article is not notable as a standalone, and the info should be merged with the into in OnTime. All useful info is in fact already in the OnTime article, and there is nothing to merge, so I just redirected it. If OnTime at some point gets moved to Axosoft, care should be taken with the history merging.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Axosoft

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. This company makes OnTime software which has its own wikipedia page. There was some relevant information about the OnTime software and I moved it to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OnTime#Features. But the company itself, as distinct from the software, is non-notable. U2fanboi (talk) 07:49, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge? The software in question has been renamed to Axosoft. Would it be more appropriate to merge the two articles into one, Axosoft? Chilblane (talk) 16:55, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge If its been renamed then merge seems the way forward Amortias (T)(C) 20:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Delete. WP:ORG clearly states that companies must be notable enough to be cited by third parties, and not just inherit notability from something associated with it. --Mr. Guye (talk) 00:05, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.