Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayşe Sibel Yanıkömeroğlu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is rough consensus that the available sources are insufficient. Randykitty (talk) 16:47, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Ayşe Sibel Yanıkömeroğlu

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Being a vice-president of a local party couldn't make her notable; unless she won a seat in the parliament or assumed a state/ national-level position, it's impossible to say she meets WP:NPOL. Htanaungg (talk) 13:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Htanaungg (talk) 13:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Htanaungg (talk) 13:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Htanaungg (talk) 13:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per the rationale by Htanaungg. Mccapra (talk) 14:31, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: if someone who speaks Turkish does a Turkish-lanugauge source search, would there be enough to meet WP:GNG? NHCLS (talk) 10:18, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The most detailed source I could find is this, however general consensus on trwiki is that the publishing website is most of the time not reliable nor independent. Apart from that there a few sources which repeat her announcements related to the plans of the party:, . The remaining are on local newspapers about her visits. For example like when she visited Edirne, a local website publishes this. Same in Elazığ, in Kırşehir and in Düzce, again, part of the party programme. I don't think these count towards GNG.  ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 17:11, 4 November 2021 (UTC)


 * comment per wp:basic: "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability" we have multiple independent sources covering article subject. --Skwovet (talk) 19:46, 5 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.