Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayagunna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. and a recommendation to further discuss potentially more accurate page names on the talk, no consensus exists here to justify my unilaterally moving it as a result of this close. (non-admin closure) —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 17:16, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Ayagunna

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

What is this? A god? A fictional form of a god? Has no references, fails WP:GNG. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  21:54, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment Probably better off looking for sources under "Ajaguna"  Bakazaka (talk) 00:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. The first sentence says that this god is part of the Santería religion. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:10, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename to Ayaguna (or possibly Ajaguna) which appears to be a more common spelling; most Google book results for Ayagunna are Wikipedia re-prints. Note, , and  which attest to this being an "avatar" of Obatala. power~enwiki ( π ,  ν ) 20:12, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:38, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep and rename to Ajaguna, (with the creation of a redirect at Ayaguna). There does appear to be sufficient coverage to warrant retention under WP:GNG God Notability Guideline? Nosebagbear (talk) 12:52, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep or mege with Obatala - the article does have some references. Vorbee (talk) 16:29, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep this book is not a passing mention, and I'm sure there's more in-depth coverage in books. w umbolo   ^^^  07:28, 29 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - but... I think WP:TNT could be enacted here. The article seems notable but it's quite unorganized and the title has issues, as being expressed in the discussion. I mean, really anything except a complete deletion would be acceptable here. Redditaddict69 14:08, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict6<b style="color:#3399FF">9</b>  14:09, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. <b style="color:#3399FF">Redditaddict</b><b style="color:#339900">6</b><b style="color:#3399FF">9</b>  14:09, 29 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.