Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayelet Argaman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Notability is a well accepted guide for inclusion, and the references used for verification (IMDB) are typically not accepted as reliable for biographies Kevin (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Ayelet Argaman

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable actress. PROD denied. Google does not show any significant coverage either in web or news searches. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:09, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as Notability is not policy. WP:V and WP:NOR are, and they are staisfied with citations. The article is fairly well-written and WP:NPOV to boot. The Google test has been debunked numerous times before. - Draeco (talk) 00:32, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment True, notability is not policy. But it is a guideline that reflects the consensus of the Wikipedia community.  Certainly, one can verifiably prove the existence of just about anyone, but if we accept that as the standard, Wikipedia will soon devolve into a collection of trivia.  Further, the only "reference" given is to Argaman's IMDB page, which is generally not considered a reliable source.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:37, 20 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per the lack of reliable sources. I have searched for sources on Google News Archive and Google Books but have been unable to find any. Draeco is correct that WP:V is policy; therefore, this article should be deleted. IMDb is not a reliable source and there are no other sources in the article, so none of the information can be verified. In addition to failing WP:BIO, this topic also fails Wikipedia's core policy of verifiability. Cunard (talk) 18:50, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice until such time as the subject can meet notability requirements. She exists, yes... but so far does not have significant coverage in RS and so fails WP:BLP. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 20:44, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.