Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayisha Fuseini


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This has been listed for nearly a month. While some of the !votes are weak, the consensus is still heavily on the keep side. It also appears that the article has been significantly edited since being nominated and the nominators concerns have been addressed in those edits. (non-admin closure) Dusti*Let's talk!* 03:41, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Ayisha Fuseini

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Has won an award but not a notable one. A search brings out a few passing mentions from reliable sources but nothing WP:SIGCOV.

Fails WP:GNG and WP:TOOSOON Lapablo (talk) 08:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:10, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:11, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Weak keep, this article is just barley acceptable of inclusion. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:04, 31 March 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, just enough coverage to establish notability: e.g. Gglobal Cosmetic News, El Pais, News Ghana, Graphic Online News, etc. Also, I wouldn't call the IIA awards "not notable." They are backed by big multinational African banks and organisations including the African Development Bank.Tamsier (talk) 02:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Draftify. A more complelte article would helpus see notability DGG ( talk ) 05:22, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, article has 4 credible sources that significantly cover the subject. Some of these sources included major media houses and corporation across the African continent and beyond and in multiple languages --Flixtey (talk) 09:27, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 16:50, 4 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep : I am not an expert, but "Al Jazeera" coverage seems to show WP:GNG. FIFAukr (talk) 14:49, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above user has been blocked indefinitely, but the point is somewhat valid. The user added an Al Jazeera interview of the subject. — MarkH21 (talk) 02:31, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passed WP:GNG. At least three reliable independent sources with significant coverage: the Global Cosmetic News article found by Tamsier (admittedly I thought it was a blog at first), Invest in Africa article, and the Al Jazeera interview. The other three sources given by Tamsier seem to be minor mentions. There is also significant coverage from an article by CAMFED, however it is not independent. — MarkH21 (talk) 02:31, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 07:04, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - Good job for finding those. Yes, Global Cosmetic News is not a blog. For some reason I'm now having technical problems with my computer. Hope it's a temporary issue. Could someone kindly add the sources to the article?Tamsier (talk) 11:07, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Never mind. I've done it.Tamsier (talk) 20:31, 19 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - Not entirely clear, but I see enough that leads me to give the benefit of the doubt re: WP:BIO. &mdash; Rhododendrites  <sup style="font-size:80%;">talk \\ 14:54, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. A Google search of the subject shows her being discussed (albeit briefly) in a number of reliable sources, including AlJazeera.  Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 18:06, 13 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.