Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aysha Naushad Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. j⚛e deckertalk 02:13, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Aysha Naushad Khan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable female cricketer who has played in minor under-19 women's tournaments in Asia. The article erroneously claims that she has played Women's One Day Internationals, however the United Arab Emirates women's cricket team doesn't hold WODI status so this part is not correct. Fails WP:CRIN and by extension WP:ATH and WP:GNG. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 16:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Johnlp (talk) 02:23, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, not so much on cricket or sports notability guidelines, but via the general notability guideline. That said, it's a borderline squeaker case; the GNG wants multiple in-depth independent sources, and if we interpret that as meaning two sources, she squeaks in with this article solely about her and [this article where she is prominently mentioned. Add that to the other sources, how she played in games, which are mostly mentions, if one considers them in total, then perhaps one could make a case for meeting the GNG, but of course it depends on interpretation. In her favor is that she plays internationally for the UAE. Her youth means there is a good chance of future articles about her. The article, still, should be short, with much of the extra stuff trimmed, like I would cut most of it.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 20:23, 11 July 2014 (UTC) One other thing -- spelling variations -- sometimes its Naushadkhan (one word), sometimes two; sometimes Aisha, sometimes Aysha, and this can cause confusion with online searching because browsers care about every little letter; what I'm saying is that spelling snafus may have caused some sources in the past to be overlooked.--[[User:Tomwsulcer|Tomwsulcer]] (talk) 20:28, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 08:27, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 02:43, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Tomwsulcer's analysis is spot on. It's a borderline squeaker case. I just lean the other way on that call. --Mkativerata (talk) 21:33, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, Tomwsulcer is completely right about this. XiuBouLin (talk) 23:52, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.