Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AyuScience - A 5000 years old science of life for longivity.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Denelson83 08:43, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

AyuScience - A 5000 years old science of life for longivity.
Obvious quackery, probable advertisement. However, the term AyuScience gets just 149 results on Google (despite claims that 500,000 doctors practice it). Seems like just an advert for a non-notable product or whatever. W.marsh 01:52, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ayurveda is a traditional form of Indian medicine.  I found an NPOV article comparing it to Western medicine in Indian health care policy.   The subject is encyclopedic but this article falls so far short that there's nothing to salvage. Durova 04:37, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this thinly desguised ad. Ayurveda is encyclopedic (if it's not in Wikipedia, I'll create it now) but this isn't it. Ifnord 04:50, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, adcruft. ComCat 05:27, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems to be copied from a forum post, and at least should be renamed even if it were encyclopaedic.  s p l i n t a x  (talk) 10:24, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Ayurveda already exists and is a fine article, Thank you --Gurubrahma 17:31, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ad, vanity.- Dak ota   t    e  17:52, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advertising. No sources cited which is always important but is essential to verifiability in the case of unorthodox science, medicine. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:59, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. Edwardian 00:31, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. jni 08:40, 11 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.