Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayurveda Retreat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:44, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Ayurveda Retreat

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG, Just a fancy name for the alternate medicine shops. Per WP:PSEUDOSCIENCE this topic does not rise to the level of notability to be covered in a separate article. Venkat TL (talk) 12:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Organizations,  and Medicine. Venkat TL (talk) 12:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails general notability guideline due to insufficient coverage. The Daily Hive reference is paid advertising and hence not independent. The Conde Nast source is possibly advertising but at any rate does not cover the article subject in detail. The Outlook source mentions nothing about the Ayurveda Retreat - it discusses another retreat that "provides education and services in wellness and health through...yoga, Ayurveda", it has nothing to do with the article subject specifically. Same with Hindustan Times. And Business Today. And Indian Express. Nothing else of substance available. The article itself looks like advertising but I do not know for what - because there isn't even a specific company? This article appears to have no real subject? The actual topic of Ayurveda is covered by an excellent Wikipedia article. There is simply no reason for this new article to exist and it may possibly meet criteria A10 for speedy deletion. However seeing as it's reached AFD, happy to contribute an argument for clear deletion. MaxnaCarta (talk) 12:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Is this supposed to be a generic article talking to the concept of ayurveda retreats or a company? It's really not clear from this poorly sourced, slightly odd article. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:16, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I am the nominator of AfD, The article creator and approver have suggested this to be draftified. I have no objections if it is either draftified or deleted. This topic is unlikely to be notable in future though.Venkat TL (talk) 13:42, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I do not support draftifying because that’s for articles which have potential to meet notability standards and I do not see how that is possible with the total lack of coverage. MaxnaCarta (talk) 14:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi Venkat TL,MaxnaCarta and Alexandermcnabb. Thanks for your valuable suggestions. Request you to suggest moving to draft stage for improvement or redirect in the interest of an amicable platform. Thanks in advance. Gardenkur (talk) 13:49, 1 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails notability. Authors ca make copy in draftspace, but I believe the AfD discussion should go to completion regardless. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 14:27, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi all. Thanks for your valuable inputs and based on the inputs I got,I support the deletion. Apologies for confusion. Looking forward to work with you all. Thanks. Gardenkur (talk) 14:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Gardenkur is the creator and per a discussion we had elsewhere now supports deletion. North8000 (talk) 14:54, 1 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete The creator Gardenkur agrees. Not a distinct topic. Which automatically means wp:notability isn't and can't be established. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 15:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per the arguments above. no apparent notability. --2A01:C22:7231:3800:DC94:D85A:E399:69DE (talk) 11:45, 4 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.