Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close per WP:G12. (non-admin closure) Savonneux (talk) 14:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Clearly a notable topic, but the way it's currently written it's a pure political advertisement. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I think this is already covered and better written at History_of_Azad_Kashmir. So WP:POVFORK and WP:A10--Savonneux (talk) 07:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. for  (talk)  08:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. for  (talk)  08:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - the author seems to be on a mission to create as many WP:NPOV WP:OR articles as possible in their first day on the wiki. for (talk)  08:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as it is a constitutional body and has executive powers. It also serves as a link between the Azad Kashmir government and the federal government of Pakistan. Very notable in the context of the Kashmir dispute and political autonomy. I would be willing to rewrite the article.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 10:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If you're up to the task I can reconsider my nomination. As for now, it's part of a sting of articles clearly created by editor, who is trying to establish a personal view on existing topics about Pakistan and India. It looks like attack, failing WP:POVFORK. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:55, 10 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I have speedy deleted it as a copyright violation, copied from here, written in 2014. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.