Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azai Inori


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 08:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Azai Inori

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Granted sources may not be easily accessible but my thoughtful searches found nothing and there are none listed at Japanese Wiki thus for an orphaned article from February 2006 with hardly any significant edits, the time for attention is now. SwisterTwister  talk  18:16, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:39, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:39, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:26, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's in the Japanese WP, and I am prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt. That I cannot find anything under the name is not necessarily relevant, and I am not able to search in Japanese.  DGG ( talk ) 04:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. If no sources can be provided to demonstrate that this person even existed, then it should be wiped from Wikipedia. The existence of a similar article on Japanese Wikipedia is definitely not a valid reason for keeping this article, especially when that article too is completely unsourced. (See WP:OTHERLANGS.) --DAJF (talk) 05:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete The Japanese article lacks sources, borders on a stub and contains only a handful of edits despite existing since 2006, meaning its gotten very little attention from the Japanese Wikipedia community. I'm unable to find sources for this person, and I'm not willing to give the article the benefit of the doubt when the Japanese article contains so many red flags. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:56, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - It is my understanding that each wiki has its own standards regarding notability, this one fails our guidelines. The Japanese article is unsourced as well.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.