Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azalin Rex (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KaisaL (talk) 06:39, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Azalin Rex
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. The 2008 AfD didn't bring anything to the table. All current sources are primary. TTN (talk) 18:34, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:34, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:34, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:34, 6 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete a lack of secondary sources showing notability. Even in 2008 there was a clear majority for deletion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:28, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Completely in-universe plot information that is sourced entirely to primary sources. Searching for additional sources turns up nothing in reliable, secondary sources.  The Keep arguments in the last no-consensus AFD from ages ago were based on arguments of his importance and appearances within primary sources, which are not valid rationale for passing the WP:GNG.  I suppose it could possibly be used as a redirect to List of Ravenloft characters, but since I don’t think that article should be kept around either, I wouldn’t advocate it. Rorshacma (talk) 19:35, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect. Not seeing any in-depth discussion that's not a PLOT summary. Can redirect to some list of DnD characters or such, but i have doubts such lists are notable, too. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:54, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete due to insufficient WP:RS to demonstrate WP:SIGCOV Chetsford (talk) 16:15, 9 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.