Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azamat Abdoullaev (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  10:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Azamat Abdoullaev
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not a notable person as per WP:BIO, page contains substantial amounts of WP:Patent nonsense, seems to have been self-authored (WP:COI), and was previously deleted unanimously: see here. The only reason I put it forward through articles for deletion and not WP:PROD is that there was already a contested WP:PROD in March. Jackcrawf3 (talk) 09:06, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:22, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:22, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:22, 1 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, as per nomination. Be sure to always double-tap the zombie articles :) MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:25, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Articles for deletion/Azamat Abdoullaev was overwhelmingly unaniamous back in 2006 but this snuck back in during 2010. Not notable as an academic, and does not pass GNG (has has written a few pieces in BBN Times that generate hits all over that site in Google News, but after filtering bbntimes there does not appear to be significant coverage).-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 09:36, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as the nomination suggests. The text would be self-serving if it were comprehensible. No indications that a wiki-notability case can be made. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 03:30, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Despite being mostly a non-notable fringe theorist, he does seem to have reasonable citation numbers for one of his works on smart cities, but it's not enough for WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:06, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BASIC. Acrols (talk) 16:15, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:PROF.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:28, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.