Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azerbaijan–Ireland relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:35, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Azerbaijan–Ireland relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination. non resident embassies. seems like their only relationship is on the football field LibStar (talk) 07:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Extraordinarily non-notable. Collect (talk) 12:29, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of significant coverage and failure to meet WP:N. - Biruitorul Talk 17:07, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:N and WP:NOTDIR. Edison (talk) 18:36, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Cookie-cutter stub using primary sources only to assert non-notability. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  22:45, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Nada to see here. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 11:54, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * NEW EVENTS HAVE MADE THESE AFDs IRRELEVANT We could really use some help with Foreign relations of Argentina by country, the first of many comprimise merges. Eventually these articles will be merged into the "diplomacy of..." articles. Lets all work together to merge these articles instead of arguing about them. So much energy has been wasted in these arguments, which could be used on merging these stub articles onto one page. I strongly encourage the nominator to withdraw the AFD nomination. Thanks. Ikip (talk) 16:35, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * why should I withdraw the nomination when there is a clear consensus developing here? LibStar (talk) 00:48, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete this unsourced stub of no established notability and none establishable by me since i fail to find any reliable sources that discuss this relationship in the depth to meet any of our notability guidelines. An additional list of non-notable unsourced content doesn't obviate the need to get rid of the unsourced, non-notable content at hand.Bali ultimate (talk) 18:41, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. There seems to be a strange pattern emerging with the Ireland-XYZ relations articles in that an unusually high number of them are being deleted- most of them, rightly so, but I would urge caution- babies and bathwater and all that. This particular article makes no assertion of notability and the only pertinent fact is that neither has even bothered too install an embassy in t'other. Very important relationship! HJMitchell    You rang?  00:36, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.