Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azerbaijan–Sweden relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Azerbaijan–Sweden relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

a random combination with non resident embassies. close to no third party coverage except football coverage and this and this, which both don't make an article. LibStar (talk) 05:39, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Another empty boiler-plate 'article'. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 08:29, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete hmm, the only relation I could find was AySel and Arash. Eurovision 2009 and 2010Sasha SonSakis Rouvas 08:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I thought we'd seen the end of this silly series.Knobbly (talk) 11:30, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Only a few thousand to go. No content, and we will be better served by single country lists. Collect (talk) 13:28, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PUTEFFORT and lack of any possible content. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No prospect of any useful content. Johnuniq (talk) 02:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; no sources to meet WP:N Nick-D (talk) 09:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete in the absence of reliable, independent sources that discuss this mooted relationship in any depth at all.Bali ultimate (talk) 12:50, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Adding 3rd party references. A growing relationship built on trade and business contacts dating back over a century to when Alfred Nobel's brothers Robert and Ludvig began extracting oil in Baku in Azerbaijan 1874.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 18:31, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Cdogsimmons. Also these two countries are members of the Council of Europe and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). According to WikiProject International relations, if two countries are in an alliance, the relations between them are notable. -- Turkish Flame   ☎  18:41, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * None of the rather lame sources added discuss the bilateral relationship at all.Bali ultimate (talk) 13:05, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * According to well established precedent and knowledge of third party coverage, if two countries are in an alliance, the relations between them are not necessarily notable. they may be, may not be but inventing a criterion to save an article is going to work. LibStar (talk) 13:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence that the topic of the article meets the General Notability Guidelines: If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article. Yilloslime T C  19:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No sources mention these relations in the depth required for an article. Hipocrite (talk) 20:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.