Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azizul Hakim Ashik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow delete. Geschichte (talk) 19:33, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Azizul Hakim Ashik

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article on a YouTuber, singer, DJ, journalist and businessperson that fails WP:BASIC, WP:CREATIVE and WP:MUSICBIO. Vanity article on another 'Jack of all trades' aiming to use Wikipedia solely as a platform for promotion. Sources cited are not WP:RS and fail to address the subject in an appropriate level of depth. A search in his native language comes up with absolutely nothing suitable. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. Fails WP:MUSICBIO as well. Lacks significant coverage in independent sources. Eternal Shadow   Talk  18:57, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, falis per nom. — Yahya ( talk  •  contribs. ) 19:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing to really discuss here. Needs to be gone. - Nemov (talk) 20:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - per all this above. Could probably have been done speedily. Politanvm talk 20:17, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Blatantly self-promotional and not notable. -- Kinu t/c 23:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Cited sources are not reliable and this article lacks news/media coverage, won't pass notability guideline. Mommmyy (talk) 04:54, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Given your rationale, I assume you meant to !vote to delete? -- Kinu t</i>/<i style="color:red">c</i> 06:13, 22 October 2021 (UTC)  – adding ping, they may not notice otherwise.  Angry Harpy    talk 12:51, 22 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Per all above. This should be WP:SNOWBALLed and deleted at this point. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:54, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the nom and the above delete voter.Brayan ocaner (talk) 20:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Too promotional to being with. Azuredivay (talk) 15:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:17, 23 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.