Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azmyth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:29, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Azmyth

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Deleted A7, which was overturned by DRV, but I can't find significant coverage in reliable sources for this band after looking over google and Gnews search results. As S Marshall said in the DRV, the "article is sourced mainly to myspace, facebook, blogs and youtube". Further, I can't find any evidence to substantiate the claim of fulfilling other criteria in WP:BAND made in the DRV. Tim Song (talk) 23:17, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:27, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:28, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete (not speedy though). I have the same sourcing issue Tim Song has, and the article reads like a big PR announcement. Also, unless I missed it, it doesn't appear that the band has released any albums. Erpert (let's talk about it) 00:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The band has released multiple albums. They have been circulated independently. However the albums are not notable enough to put on wikipedia. They meet at least two of the requirements for notability, and have worked with many notable people. The band is also one of the most notable from Ocala, Fl. Being noted as the next big band from Ocala, Fl. Orange Springs, Fl is just where they originated from. You can see that in a few of the references.--Nascarman456 (talk) 01:12, 31 May 2010 (UTC)Nascarman456 — Nascarman456 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep The article is now more notably sourced. The band itself indeed meets requirements for notability. This band is releasing a CD in June also. I think they finance everything themselves, so it is low budget, not getting a lot of media attention, but the band has gained quite a bit of popularity. The band themselves do get quite a bit of media attention around the state of Florida, and surrounding states.--Positiveoutlook5 (talk) 06:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC) — Positiveoutlook5 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * None of those new sources even mention the band's name (yes, I looked through all of them). And you "think" the band finances everything themselves? How do you know? I think you should read WP:BAND. Erpert (let's talk about it) 17:34, 31 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - sorting through the mess of sourcing to look at only the ones from reliable sources, what I gather is that this band has had some local success in "battle of the bands" type competitions and may be the next big thing to come out of the area. When they do become that big thing, then would be the time for an article.  At this time some minor local coverage doesn't really establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 18:56, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete i see no real notability here, the sourcing despite initial appearences is lacking and nothing else satisfies wp:music. looks like spam duffbeerforme (talk) 11:13, 1 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete No indication that the band satisfies WP:BAND. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 21:19, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks the coverage in independent reliable sources required to establish notability. Nuttah (talk) 12:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.