Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azoteq (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE due to small participation. Davewild (talk) 07:13, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Azoteq
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails to meet the requirements of WP:CORP. Nothing appears to have changed since the previous AFD in 2012. SmartSE (talk) 21:03, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Leaning towards delete simply because there are many sources outside of the current ones, a News search found mostly press releases, highbeam but mostly for patents and one thefreelibrary. SwisterTwister   talk  20:03, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:44, 1 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:17, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.