Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aztec mythology in popular culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Aztec mythology in popular culture

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Similar to the previous AfD on Japanese mythology in popular culture, this is also unadulterated listcruft since its creation - a clear example farm with no context that mentions anything named after an Aztec god, regardless of whether it resembles the actual god. Fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE. While it could be a notable topic, it would require a 100% rewrite to be enyclopedic, making the current version of the article, which is largely WP:OR, deletion-worthy. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:27, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Like the recent Japanese mythology AFD mentioned in the nomination, this is an article with a potentially notable title, but whose contents are wholly inappropriate for the encyclopedia, being nothing more than a TV Tropes style list of examples that are either poorly sourced or unsourced. In addition, the bulk of the examples are either utterly non-notable, or flat out WP:OR. While a decently sourced prose article or section in Aztec mythology would be acceptable, the current article should not remain in the main space until such a time one is created. Rorshacma (talk) 20:32, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing to mention https://shadowrun.fandom.com/wiki/Aztechnology . No, seriously, delete due to failing GNG/NLIST/etc. But like observed above, this could be rewritten into a prose analysis, but (WP:TNT), such a rewrite is unlikely to reuse anything from the current TVtrope-like list. Ping User:Uncle G, User:TompaDompa, in case either would like to add it to their to do list... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.