Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azzareya Curtis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 05:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Azzareya Curtis

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable. Credits are a few music videos and apparently some calendars, but there are no reliable sources to back this up or prove notability - its existing refs are sites like "hiphopgalaxy.com."  Mbinebri  talk &larr; 03:33, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete the article does mention TV appearances, which according to IMDB is something called "Wild 'N Out" and is apparently a background part or at least not a named role. And as sourcing goes, stuff like "hiphogalaxy.com" and "topsexywomen.com" just aren't going to cut it. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  10:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - in addition to the several significant roles in several notable music videos, this prolific glam model was the Cover Model on the 2005 Lovely Latin Ladies calendar by Mark Thompson. I have added the reference to the main article. Unionsoap (talk) 03:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm about 99.9999% sure that a "2005 Lovely Latin Ladies calendar" is not considered a reliable source for encyclopedia purposes. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:33, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Booty dancing in a music video = non-notable. Playing the singer's girlfriend in a music video... by booty dancing = non-notable.  Being on the cover of a skanky calendar = non-notable.  And lastly, having no reliable sources to cite = non-notable.    Mbinebri   talk &larr; 16:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as NN per my original prod nomination. Complete lack of reliable source third party coverage. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:34, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.