Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B&N writers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Delete. I didn't delete the page, but it's gone now so I'm closing the discussion. - b o b b y 20:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

B&N writers


"Wikipedia is not a blog...or social networking site." Nor is it a place to complain about net drama from them, or advertise for another one. mordicai. 18:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as this site doesn't meet WP:WEB and this isn't an article, it's a POV essay.--Isotope23 18:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as an attack page: "Jackson has been allowed to release his poisonous religious propaganda once again". Forumcruft of the absolute worst kind. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:51, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - for the attacks on Jackson and advertising the forum. Tagged as such. - b o b b y  19:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.