Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bálint Varga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 03:57, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Bálint Varga

 * – ( View AfD View log )

It is rather self-promotional content, created by one person, who seems to be closely related to the topic. He/she also created and dramatically expanded a few articles related to the subject of this article (his audiobook), that lacking any notability. Essentially, this article does not meet any of: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS). Recommend deletion.Kolma8 (talk) 21:48, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom. Saddened to make this decision since I am Hungarian myself, but the presented sources do not establish notability, as they are all PR stuff and an also promotional page in Blikk, a Hungarian tabloid. I couldn't find anything better during a google search. He doesn't even has a huwiki page (although I know that is not a reason + unfortunately, huwiki does not have articles on a lot of topics). It doesn't help that the name "Bálint Varga" (or "Varga Bálint") is an extremely common name in Hungary, so of course, stuff about other people named as such also popped up. The description at the article creation also indicates COI issues, although I am not exactly sure about that, as the creator edited a lot of pages, not just this one. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 10:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Sigh. Can't we leave articles unchanged that are nominated for AfD? I recognize that what was removed was unsourced - but since many times that is exactly what prompts the AfD in the first place, I would very much like to have the article left the way it is and have it evaluated by the community, including the unsourced material. Maybe the AfD review would have caused someone to find the sources - I see it happening quite often....--Concertmusic (talk) 15:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 21:13, 16 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.