Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Béla Floncz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  09:29, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Béla Floncz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is most probably a hoax, as there are no results in Google for his native name (Floncz Béla). The creator has written a few articles about non-existent topics in the Hungarian Wikipedia. Einstein2 (talk) 17:30, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

The source seems to be a hoax, too, specially prepared for this article. Hoaxbusters (talk) 18:12, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Even if it was not a hoax, there is no clear claim to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:29, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:40, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:40, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - not notable and reads like poor fiction writing. Kierzek (talk) 14:42, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - The subject's notability claim is similar to multiple Japanese soldiers with articles in Japanese holdout - If sourced - it would be notable - he continued his WWII fight until 1950, and would be a very rare European holdout (there were some German holdouts for approx. 120 days - but that's it I think). Currently sourced to  - which doesn't seem at a glance to be a WP:RS. No additional sources evident in a search. Would support keep if sourced.Icewhiz (talk) 14:47, 29 June 2017 (UTC) Modifying to Delete after looking at this source a bit more. This claim needs to be backed up by a RS.Icewhiz (talk) 15:40, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails almost every constraint I can think of.-- Georgia Army Vet  Contribs  Talk  15:00, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment, the only source for the article is a page made on Webnode gtranslation of its homepage is "Make your website for free! More than 27 million users already have their own web site.  It's really simple. Join today" so it is not useable, a gsearch brings up nothing but various wikipages, so this looks like a delete as one of those urban myths/explanations of the old eccentric fellow living alone in the neighbourhood. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:05, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as probable hoax. No reliable sources to establish notability. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:01, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Other cases like this are much better referenced and covered in reliable sources (for instace: Jānis Pīnups), and the difficulty of finding coverage suggests this might indeed be a hoax. Smmurphy(Talk) 17:55, 2 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.