Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bögholmen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Laholm Municipality. ✗ plicit  01:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Bögholmen

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

An unsourced, single sentence stub since creation. Appears to fail WP:GEOLAND. I am not fluent in Swedish, but the only scant coverage I could find, aside from Wikipedia mirrors, basically confirms that it.. exists? In the Swedish Wikipedia, it's currently a redirect to Laholm Municipality. I would be supportive of this option as an alternative to deletion entirely. KangarooGymnast (talk) 00:18, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Sweden.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:18, 5 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Laholm Municipality. I did a check of Swedish sources, and at best, there's some newspaper articles mentioning Bögholmen, but basically none about Bögholmen. Maybe there's better offline sources, but until those show up, a redirect is fine. Cortador (talk) 08:17, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Laholm Municipality until and unless adequate, reliable sources can be found discussing it as a distinct place. Eluchil404 (talk) 02:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.